• Tismi Dipalaya Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sastra, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia
  • St. Muriati St. Muriati Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sastra, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Feri Firmansyah Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sastra, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Angelin Wardiarini Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sastra, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia



graphing skill, quantitative skill, science literacy


The 21st Century educational paradigm requires students to have various life skills in dealing with the information and digital era. Scientific literacy and quantitative skills are important for students to have as life skills. Scientific literacy helps students develop cognitive reasoning and scientific attitudes. This competency assists students in processing information, building arguments, and formulating solutions regarding natural processes around them. Most of the latest information from all aspects of life is presented in quantitative form. Therefore it is necessary for students to have quantitative skills in responding to challenges in the 21st century that will work a lot with quantitative data. Graphing skill is an intersection of scientific literacy and quantitative skills. Through graphing skills students have competency in understanding, criticizing, and constructing graphs. Understanding scientific information from graphs is the first step for students to solve scientific problems and transfer scientific information. Low Graphing skills become a hindering factor for students in learning scientific concepts. Therefore, this study was proposed with the aim of examining the graphing skill profile of students which includes the ability to understand, criticize, and construct graphs. This research is expected to present initial data that can be used as a reference in developing a learning activity that can develop students' graphing skills. This research is a descriptive quantitative research. The population of this study were all students of 10th grade from 23 public high schools in Makassar City. To determine the schools to be sampled, simple random sampling technique was used. Respondents for each school in this study were determined as much as 10% of the number of 10th grade students who were randomly selected. Data collection was carried out using a Graphing Inventory which was modified into Indonesian which was then tested for validity and reliability. Data analysis was performed using quantitative descriptive analysis.


Bagasta, A. R., Rahmawati, D., Wahyuni, I. P., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik di Salah Satu SMA Negeri Kota Sragen. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 121-129.

Boote, S. K. (2014). Assessing and understanding line graph interpretations using a scoring rubric of organized cited factors. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(3), 333-354.

Boote, S. K., & Boote, D. N. (2017). Leaping from discrete to continuous independent variables: Sixth graders’ science line graph interpretations. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 455-484.

Chang, H. Y., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 858-886.

Fadilah, M., Permanasari, A., Riandi, R., & Maryani, E. (2020). Analisis Karakteristik Kemampuan Literasi Sains Konteks Bencana Gempa Bumi Mahasiswa Pendidikan IPA pada Domain Pengetahuan Prosedural dan Epistemik. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 4(1), 103-119.

Hung, J. F., Ko, C. H., & Yang, W. M. (2017). Effectiveness of Teaching That can Promote the Data Modeling Ability of Junior High School Students. US-China Education Review, 7(9), 401-413.

KL, N. S., & Dasgupta, C. (2018, December). Investigating the nature of students' reasoning in connecting molecular structures of stereoisomers with their physical properties using an ar app. In 2018 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E) (pp. 53-60). IEEE.

Lai, K., Cabrera, J., Vitale, J. M., Madhok, J., Tinker, R., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Measuring graph comprehension, critique, and construction in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 665-681.

Masrifah, M., Setiawan, A., Sinaga, P., & Setiawan, W. (2019). Investigasi Kemampuan Representasi Grafik Mahasiswa Fisika Pada Konsep Hukum Newton. SAINTIFIK@, 3(2).

Matuk, C., Zhang, J., Uk, I., & Linn, M. C. (2019). Qualitative graphing in an authentic inquiry context: How construction and critique help middle school students to reason about cancer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 905-936.

Meisadewi, N. (2016). Pengembangan Kegiatan Praktikum Berbasis Kuantitatif Untuk Meningkatkan Graphing Skills Siswa Kelas X Pada Materi Perubahan Lingkungan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Mustain, I. (2015). Kemampuan membaca dan interpretasi grafik dan data: Studi kasus pada siswa kelas 8 SMPN. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 4(2).

Pelliccia, C. A. (2018). Graphing and estimation as tools to improve critical thinking in high school chemistry students.

Pendidikan, K., & Indonesia, K. R. (2016). Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

PISA, O. (2017). PISA for Development Assesment and Analytical Framework.

Ring, M., Brahm, T., & Randler, C. (2019). Do difficulty levels matter for graphical literacy? A performance assessment study with authentic graphs. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1787-1804.

Roohr, K. C., Graf, E. A., & Liu, O. L. (2014). Assessing quantitative literacy in higher education: An overview of existing research and assessments with recommendations for next‐generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(2), 1-26.

Saputra, I. D. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inquiri Terbimbing dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Graphing Skills Siswa SMA pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan. Jurnal Life Science: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 1(2).

Vitale, J. M., Applebaum, L., & Linn, M. C. (2019). Coordinating between graphs and science concepts: Density and buoyancy. Cognition and Instruction, 37(1), 38-72.

Wang ZH, Wei S, Ding W, Chen X, Wang X, Hu K. (2014) Students’ Cognitive Reasoning of Graphs: Characteristics and progression. International Journal of Science Education, 34(13):2015–2041.



How to Cite