PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR PKn MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DIRECT INSTRUCTION PADA SISWA KELAS II SD INPRES NIPA-NIPA KOTA MAKASSAR

Arini  Amran; Mas’ud  Muhammadiah; Susalti Nur  Arsyad

doi:10.52208/klasikal.v2i2.83

Authors

Arini Amran Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia
Mas’ud Muhammadiah Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia
Susalti Nur Arsyad Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v2i2.83

Keywords:

Learning Achievement, civics, Direct Instruction

Abstract

The research was to describe the Direct Instruction Method for Increasing Of study result Nationality Learning sub title environment treatment in Elementary School of Nipa-Nipa Makassar.Type of this research was Classroom Ation Research which based on several steps, such as planning, action implementation observation, evaluation, and reflection. Subject of the research were II class students SD Inpres Nipa-Nipai Makassar as many as 27 students. Data collection used observation and the next test analyzed by descriptive method. The result of the research showed that the Direct Instruction Method could improve learnig result of students in II class SD Inpres Nipa-Nipa Makassar. In this case based on the improvement average value of learning result from 54.23% in cycle I became 78.63% in cycle II and the increase of average value is eleven percent. So, this research is considered successful on minimal criteria completeness from 34% at cycle I to 81% at cycle II.

References

educational technology. Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

Baer, J. (1993). Craetivity and Divergent Thinking: A Task Spesifik Approach. London: Lawrence Elbaum Associates Publisher.

Dahar, Ratna Wilis. 1989. Teori Belajar, Jakarta: Erlangga Press

Fisher, R. (1995). Teaching Children to Think. London: Stanley Thornes Ltd.

Harris, R (2000). Criteria for Evaluating a Creative Solution. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.virtualsalt.com/creative.htm. (16 April 2016).

Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T. 2002. Meanigfull Assesmen. USA: Allyn & Bacon.

Koes, Supriono. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Fisika. Malang. JICA.

LTSIN (2001). Learning Teaching. Scotland: Learning and Teaching Scotland.

Marsono, R. J. et al. (1988). Dimention of Thinking A Frame Work for Curriculum and instruction. Virginia: Assosiation for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Moh. Roqib. (2009). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Yogyakarta. LKis

Nurdin, M. (2005). Pendidikan yang Menyebalkan. Yogyakarta. Ar Ruzz

Nurhadi. (2004). Kurikulum 2004: Pertanyaan dan Jawaban. Jakarta. Grasindo

Parkin, D.N. (1995) What Creative Thinking Is. Costa, A.L. (Ed) Developing Minds A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. (hlm. 58-61) Alexanra, Virginia: Assosiation for Supervisions and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Rofi’uddin, A. (2000). Model Pendidikan Berpikir Kritis-Kreatif Untuk Siswa Sekolah

Seel dan Richey. (1994). Instructional Technology. AECT. Washinton, DC

Slavin, R.E. (2000). Cooperative Learning Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd Ed.

London: Allyn and Bacon.

Sugiono, Koes H. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Fisika. Malang: Jurusan Fisika Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Malang.

Thiagarajan, S Dorothy S Semmel, and Melvyn I, Semmel. (1975). Instructional

Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children, A Sourcebook, Bloomington. Center for Innovation on Teaching the Handicapped.

Thomas, Alice and Thorne, Glenda, (2009) How to Increase Higher Level Thinking (Online). Tersedia: http: cdi.org/articles/how-to-increase-high-order-thinking/(visited Oct 20,2015)

Yeni Rachmawati dan Eus Kurniati. (2011). Strategi Pengembangan Kreativitas padaAnak Usia Taman Kanak-Kanak. Jakarta. Kencana.

Yulianto, A. (2016). Pendidikan Ramah Anak: Studi Kasus. Jurnal online IAIN

Surakarta, Vol.1, No.2. IAIN Surakarta.